This provides a fascinating new perspective and I have picked up snippets which I was not aware of. Also there are slightly different versions of events from Ken Englade's book which on reflection make more sense. However Ep 2 is misleading in respect of Elizabeth's confession.Elizabeth was not broken by the detectives touching a raw nerve. She stubbornly stonewalled them, which is what Soering should have done. Only after she was eventually made aware that Soering had confessed and implicated her did she then confess because she knew the game was up. That was overlooked.
Hat man die Gelegenheit wenigstens genutzt, um den Podcast qualitativ zu verbessern oder wurden die Fehler wieder gleich mit übersetzt.
Z.B. Terry Wright boostet ja ordentlich in Richtung seiner Wahrheitsfindung: Schlüsselargumente wie die blutigen Schuhabdrücke belegen Sörings Geständnisaussagen (stand hinter Derek Haysom sitzend), der Zimmerservice wurde (wohl von Haysom) mit Unterschrift bestätigt oder Haysom erinnerte sich an ihre Kartennr (Mitschrift im Hotel) entbehren eigentlich jeglicher Substanz. Eignen sich aber prima zur Weiterverbreitung. Was soll es Andrew, wenn es der Mission dient 🤷
Andrew, do we know for a fact that the Netflix documentary is actually independent? If Söring is participating or cooperating in some way, his radio silence might be explained by some type of nondisclosure agreement. What think?
Netflix has assured me that they paid Söring only a modest sum for access to some of his personal documents. Netflix doesn't pay for interviews, they didn't pay for mine, except to compensate me for my time and expenses. I think they've learned from "Making a Murderer", which has been subject to increasing criticism and is now being directly challenged. Further, I told the Netflix people that I would watch every episode and would challenge any serious errors or distortions.
The people I've spoken to were all very professional. They realized this isn't 2019 anymore, and Söring's narrative has been severely challenged, if not refuted. I am sure they'll try to gin up some "he-said, she-said" controversy to keep the pot boiling -- a true crime series isn't a graduate seminar -- but I think it will be reasonably balanced.
This provides a fascinating new perspective and I have picked up snippets which I was not aware of. Also there are slightly different versions of events from Ken Englade's book which on reflection make more sense. However Ep 2 is misleading in respect of Elizabeth's confession.Elizabeth was not broken by the detectives touching a raw nerve. She stubbornly stonewalled them, which is what Soering should have done. Only after she was eventually made aware that Soering had confessed and implicated her did she then confess because she knew the game was up. That was overlooked.
Hat man die Gelegenheit wenigstens genutzt, um den Podcast qualitativ zu verbessern oder wurden die Fehler wieder gleich mit übersetzt.
Z.B. Terry Wright boostet ja ordentlich in Richtung seiner Wahrheitsfindung: Schlüsselargumente wie die blutigen Schuhabdrücke belegen Sörings Geständnisaussagen (stand hinter Derek Haysom sitzend), der Zimmerservice wurde (wohl von Haysom) mit Unterschrift bestätigt oder Haysom erinnerte sich an ihre Kartennr (Mitschrift im Hotel) entbehren eigentlich jeglicher Substanz. Eignen sich aber prima zur Weiterverbreitung. Was soll es Andrew, wenn es der Mission dient 🤷
Tatsachen muss man kennen, bevor man sie verdrehen kann (Mark Twain).
Fühlen Sie sich angesprochen?
Andrew, do we know for a fact that the Netflix documentary is actually independent? If Söring is participating or cooperating in some way, his radio silence might be explained by some type of nondisclosure agreement. What think?
Netflix has assured me that they paid Söring only a modest sum for access to some of his personal documents. Netflix doesn't pay for interviews, they didn't pay for mine, except to compensate me for my time and expenses. I think they've learned from "Making a Murderer", which has been subject to increasing criticism and is now being directly challenged. Further, I told the Netflix people that I would watch every episode and would challenge any serious errors or distortions.
The people I've spoken to were all very professional. They realized this isn't 2019 anymore, and Söring's narrative has been severely challenged, if not refuted. I am sure they'll try to gin up some "he-said, she-said" controversy to keep the pot boiling -- a true crime series isn't a graduate seminar -- but I think it will be reasonably balanced.
Können Sie diese "Lives" bitte verlinken? Das würde mich auch sehr interessieren.
Das habe ich von 3 verlässlichen Quellen erfahren. Natürlich habe ich die Verträge bzw. Kontoauszüge nicht, dazu hat nur Söring Zugang.