Discussion about this post

User's avatar
StopperCrime's avatar

This provides a fascinating new perspective and I have picked up snippets which I was not aware of. Also there are slightly different versions of events from Ken Englade's book which on reflection make more sense. However Ep 2 is misleading in respect of Elizabeth's confession.Elizabeth was not broken by the detectives touching a raw nerve. She stubbornly stonewalled them, which is what Soering should have done. Only after she was eventually made aware that Soering had confessed and implicated her did she then confess because she knew the game was up. That was overlooked.

Expand full comment
Doc Crimescene's avatar

Hat man die Gelegenheit wenigstens genutzt, um den Podcast qualitativ zu verbessern oder wurden die Fehler wieder gleich mit übersetzt.

Z.B. Terry Wright boostet ja ordentlich in Richtung seiner Wahrheitsfindung: Schlüsselargumente wie die blutigen Schuhabdrücke belegen Sörings Geständnisaussagen (stand hinter Derek Haysom sitzend), der Zimmerservice wurde (wohl von Haysom) mit Unterschrift bestätigt oder Haysom erinnerte sich an ihre Kartennr (Mitschrift im Hotel) entbehren eigentlich jeglicher Substanz. Eignen sich aber prima zur Weiterverbreitung. Was soll es Andrew, wenn es der Mission dient 🤷

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts