Hi Andrew, yeah STBC will finalize their investigation. That is better than have no end in their project. Whatever they found out your conviction is not far. Everybody has to know it before .
But I find it quite poor. Why? You are 2.5 year on this case. But I miss your solid big picture. Your arguments pro or contra the version of Elizabeth and Jens did it, are quiet superficial. You are spending thousands and thousands words on five identified pseudo lies and why Soering is the double murderer, but you are not able to establish a big picture by puzzling all the facts or details to stick one together. What is the reason for this? Hey we are in the field of true crime which develops richness throughout creation. As you know you are also only speculating. But what I can read here about the crime scene....? You are using Burton's testimony, what could have happened to blood "B" type on the rag out of her report. Wow. That is theoretical. No statistics about probabilities. Honestly, before you are writing about the dish rag with blood type B on it, first BE SURE what you have identified as the dish rag. As your content mentor Wright is speculating, that the dish rag was located in the CLOSED WASHER (cause Soering said it to be half opened), you are pointing to the red and brown rag IN FRONT of the closed washer. But you know the picture where those TWO RAGS are lying in the DIRT on the kitchen ground. So it is absolute NONSENSE that those 2 rags deliver FORENSIC EVIDENCE!
It think it is also nonsense to speculate what the advantages for Soering would be. Their goal was to stay together after their extradition. This is written in their letters. So no speculation. The next milestone of speculation is that Wright got it completely wrong in the podcast System Soering. Wright had puzzled a message together in which Soering wanted to calm down Elizabeth on the 5.th of June by telling her, that the US cops have nothing serious against them. So why fearing a video showing Soering with no pants on 🤦. The fact is that Soering waved his arms that only he will telling the truth and so the investigators had listened to him by partly foresaying him details of the crime scene. The first thre days Haysom had been completely ignored as to a murder investigation. Good job Soering! According to the crime scene: Nothing about the footprint. Well you can write further thousand words but this shoe print (Converse Arizona) belongs not to Soering
Whether 8.5 women size or even smaller. Haysom admitted in the New Yorker interview by Heller that the shoe imprints could have been made by her mother 🤦 wow that is your key witness after being convicted and incarcerated.
Well, Andrew you know that we have the same pictures so please be more detailed!
Try to find out what speaks against Soering had eaten leftovers with the Haysoms!
Try to find out what speaks for no fight at the table!
Try to find out what speaks for 2 at the crime scene (think of the shower which was negotiated by Wright)!
Try to find out why Haysom is talking lies as she said there was no money for the second rocky horror picture movie ticket or she had called Kim or Beth!
Try to find out all the details Soering had given in his confessions which are not present at the crime scene!
Try to remember Haysom's testimony as she had told to Sweeney that Soering wanted to split blame on her in paying the knife and other things. It is more logical that he makes her the acceessory before the fact just establishing the alibi than making her the innocent angel who doesn't know anything 🤦He said she will only get a few years. Why? Cause he believed her family contact quality like Lady Astor might help her??!! And they also should set him free. (First rescue my butt and then yours).
And last but of course not least Updike's theory of the hidden light switch in the master bedroom. Well that is convincing as hell. Isn't it.
Try to find out if both wanted to stage the crime scene. Fact details are, Victor Mouse Trap positioned on blood near dead Nancy Haysom. A triangle with at least one six near Derek Haysom, also with a V-shaped cut in his chin. Unidentified hanks of hairs in the blood near the dining room table. Strange scratched shapes in the blood on the stone floor in the dining room. Well the consequence by this type of staging was leading the investigation to cult murder. Bravo!
Well I am looking forward being open to what STBC had found out. You seem to be the opposite judging them before!
Hi Andrew, yeah STBC will finalize their investigation. That is better than have no end in their project. Whatever they found out your conviction is not far. Everybody has to know it before .
But I find it quite poor. Why? You are 2.5 year on this case. But I miss your solid big picture. Your arguments pro or contra the version of Elizabeth and Jens did it, are quiet superficial. You are spending thousands and thousands words on five identified pseudo lies and why Soering is the double murderer, but you are not able to establish a big picture by puzzling all the facts or details to stick one together. What is the reason for this? Hey we are in the field of true crime which develops richness throughout creation. As you know you are also only speculating. But what I can read here about the crime scene....? You are using Burton's testimony, what could have happened to blood "B" type on the rag out of her report. Wow. That is theoretical. No statistics about probabilities. Honestly, before you are writing about the dish rag with blood type B on it, first BE SURE what you have identified as the dish rag. As your content mentor Wright is speculating, that the dish rag was located in the CLOSED WASHER (cause Soering said it to be half opened), you are pointing to the red and brown rag IN FRONT of the closed washer. But you know the picture where those TWO RAGS are lying in the DIRT on the kitchen ground. So it is absolute NONSENSE that those 2 rags deliver FORENSIC EVIDENCE!
It think it is also nonsense to speculate what the advantages for Soering would be. Their goal was to stay together after their extradition. This is written in their letters. So no speculation. The next milestone of speculation is that Wright got it completely wrong in the podcast System Soering. Wright had puzzled a message together in which Soering wanted to calm down Elizabeth on the 5.th of June by telling her, that the US cops have nothing serious against them. So why fearing a video showing Soering with no pants on 🤦. The fact is that Soering waved his arms that only he will telling the truth and so the investigators had listened to him by partly foresaying him details of the crime scene. The first thre days Haysom had been completely ignored as to a murder investigation. Good job Soering! According to the crime scene: Nothing about the footprint. Well you can write further thousand words but this shoe print (Converse Arizona) belongs not to Soering
Whether 8.5 women size or even smaller. Haysom admitted in the New Yorker interview by Heller that the shoe imprints could have been made by her mother 🤦 wow that is your key witness after being convicted and incarcerated.
Well, Andrew you know that we have the same pictures so please be more detailed!
Try to find out what speaks against Soering had eaten leftovers with the Haysoms!
Try to find out what speaks for no fight at the table!
Try to find out what speaks for 2 at the crime scene (think of the shower which was negotiated by Wright)!
Try to find out why Haysom is talking lies as she said there was no money for the second rocky horror picture movie ticket or she had called Kim or Beth!
Try to find out all the details Soering had given in his confessions which are not present at the crime scene!
Try to remember Haysom's testimony as she had told to Sweeney that Soering wanted to split blame on her in paying the knife and other things. It is more logical that he makes her the acceessory before the fact just establishing the alibi than making her the innocent angel who doesn't know anything 🤦He said she will only get a few years. Why? Cause he believed her family contact quality like Lady Astor might help her??!! And they also should set him free. (First rescue my butt and then yours).
And last but of course not least Updike's theory of the hidden light switch in the master bedroom. Well that is convincing as hell. Isn't it.
Try to find out if both wanted to stage the crime scene. Fact details are, Victor Mouse Trap positioned on blood near dead Nancy Haysom. A triangle with at least one six near Derek Haysom, also with a V-shaped cut in his chin. Unidentified hanks of hairs in the blood near the dining room table. Strange scratched shapes in the blood on the stone floor in the dining room. Well the consequence by this type of staging was leading the investigation to cult murder. Bravo!
Well I am looking forward being open to what STBC had found out. You seem to be the opposite judging them before!