Listening again to a bit of the quixotic theory of the case contrived by Harding/Hudson, I cannot help but note that I have never heard either of these two small town gangbusters explain how Derek Haysom's tax returns, in a large manilla envelope, were post-marked on the Monday following the crimes in Washington D.C. This meant that the tax returns would have been dropped off in a mailbox somewhere in the D.C. area over the weekend. This envelope was entered into evidence and was something that had to be given real consideration by the jury. I have held this envelope in my hands. ( I suppose that means that there is a chance that my DNA is on it.) How did these tax returns get to DC.? And why? If ' two men both bleeding', as the Harding/Hudson alternative theory goes, somehow got into that house, they would have had to know about and be interested in getting the tax returns--which apparently were the only thing taken from the crime scene--and they would have had to search for them among Derek Haysom's personal papers or in his desk, and having located them they would have had to make the two hour plus trip to Washington, locate a mail box and drop them off.
Well cause of the great efforts of STBC we can keep this short and simple.
1) There was a time in which your firm argument was the DNA Retesting is useless and nonsense. Or in other words. What happened to you since yesterday??!!
2) it is quite odd that Haysom's voice comes permanently through her cousin. So her own attitude is only transferred. And I do not understand her decision. She could convince a lot of people even in her own family!
The idea to investigate the 3 beer cans (inside) out of the master bedroom for DNA is a great idea.
From my contact with Soering, he couldn't even remember those 3 beer cans. Beer cans and drinking on the drive to LC was a part of his confession.
Listening again to a bit of the quixotic theory of the case contrived by Harding/Hudson, I cannot help but note that I have never heard either of these two small town gangbusters explain how Derek Haysom's tax returns, in a large manilla envelope, were post-marked on the Monday following the crimes in Washington D.C. This meant that the tax returns would have been dropped off in a mailbox somewhere in the D.C. area over the weekend. This envelope was entered into evidence and was something that had to be given real consideration by the jury. I have held this envelope in my hands. ( I suppose that means that there is a chance that my DNA is on it.) How did these tax returns get to DC.? And why? If ' two men both bleeding', as the Harding/Hudson alternative theory goes, somehow got into that house, they would have had to know about and be interested in getting the tax returns--which apparently were the only thing taken from the crime scene--and they would have had to search for them among Derek Haysom's personal papers or in his desk, and having located them they would have had to make the two hour plus trip to Washington, locate a mail box and drop them off.
Why?
I wish EH would change her mind and request it.
Mr. H you have been rather quiet. I hope it means your doing stuff in the background. This can’t be it now, right?
Well cause of the great efforts of STBC we can keep this short and simple.
1) There was a time in which your firm argument was the DNA Retesting is useless and nonsense. Or in other words. What happened to you since yesterday??!!
2) it is quite odd that Haysom's voice comes permanently through her cousin. So her own attitude is only transferred. And I do not understand her decision. She could convince a lot of people even in her own family!
The idea to investigate the 3 beer cans (inside) out of the master bedroom for DNA is a great idea.
From my contact with Soering, he couldn't even remember those 3 beer cans. Beer cans and drinking on the drive to LC was a part of his confession.