1 Comment
User's avatar
Doc Crimescene's avatar

https://n.b5z.net/i/u/7000525/f/SockenSchuabdruck/IV_C_1_Affidavit_by_Juror_Jake_Bibb.pdf

IMO Jake Bibb took his job as a juror very seriously. In his affidavit he stated that the job of the commonwealth/jurors was to place Soering at the scene by evidence. Without the footprint as evidence, which could fit to Soering, you only have blood 0 without a subtype. So you only have his confession with some details which fit to the crimescene. Also many differs. Honestly it seems a bit senseless to have the job as a juror to convict Soering, who is talking about another female killer for the first time, having no chance to see how the key witness would react to her fitting shoe imprint, senseless alibi story (missing ticket for RHP), blood B, showering, her cash made of selling jewels and other serious things Neaton could not ask her in his examination. 🤷

Expand full comment