There's a good chance he would have gotten out sooner if he had admitted killing the Haysoms and expressed genuine remorse, which he never did even during the 4 years when he was a confessed killer. He himself complains that he was kept in prison longer because he refused to express remorse.
The vast majority of American convicted murderers are released well before their formal sentence expires; they spend an average of 14.8 years in prison. Soering and Haysom were kept in longer because their crime was much more heinous than the average murder: They carefully plotted to ambush and murder two innocent people, and Söring butchered their bodies beyond recognition and never expressed remorse. Virginia would have been well within its rights to keep Söring until he died, which is an unusual fate even for people sentenced to life.
It's entirely possible Soering was kept in longer because he had insulted and defamed so many people, engendering anger and resentment. Ultimately, there is no way to tell what would have happened; it's a counterfactual.
Bullshit Andrew. Haysom communicated her two obligations for returning to the US and committing a guilty plea instead of proceeding her fight for extradition to Canada. 1) Not to rotten in jail. 2) Same punishment for Soering which she could enforce with her testimony.
So in her guilty plea she had to emphasize several times that she only admit to be an accessory before the fact, which sounds quite ridiculous on trial recordings.
It was the family and the connect to Sweeney which hold her longer in prison than she had planned before returning to the US and to help the Commonwealth.
So Soering could have admitted to be an active part of the killings (most likely version) or to be the single killer. He would have been kept in prison as long as Haysom whatever his version would sound like. So he had choosen the 20/80% chance to tell his DC version. Neaton had known that the verdict would end up in a guilty verdict by passing the London confessions in front of the jury.
I guess you are at the beginning of your journey. A man who is pronouncing to be innocent of a serious crime has zero reasons to lie, correct? If you are asking Soering about the case personally you will get aware of some details are getting inconsistent. The other thing is that Soering had 33 years to think about the case and what he told to the police being at the crime scene but what he couldn't have experienced in real cause he "was in DC" due to his version. In some of his actual reasons about wrong details in his confessions (yt video) he had adopted some arguments by myself after analyzing pictures from the crime scene which I found quite weird cause I'm on his case since 6 years. If you will challenge his DC story and the fact that he doesn't have an alibi then it becomes even more weird. His story is that the DC trip was intended to be a sexual intensive weekend for two. But the most weird thing is that they made a huge amount of cash in DC by selling jewelry which will make the motive for a drug deal to solve Haysom's dept nonsense. So forget about to be able to judge about truth what Soering writing in books about what he didn't had done 🤷
There's a good chance he would have gotten out sooner if he had admitted killing the Haysoms and expressed genuine remorse, which he never did even during the 4 years when he was a confessed killer. He himself complains that he was kept in prison longer because he refused to express remorse.
The vast majority of American convicted murderers are released well before their formal sentence expires; they spend an average of 14.8 years in prison. Soering and Haysom were kept in longer because their crime was much more heinous than the average murder: They carefully plotted to ambush and murder two innocent people, and Söring butchered their bodies beyond recognition and never expressed remorse. Virginia would have been well within its rights to keep Söring until he died, which is an unusual fate even for people sentenced to life.
It's entirely possible Soering was kept in longer because he had insulted and defamed so many people, engendering anger and resentment. Ultimately, there is no way to tell what would have happened; it's a counterfactual.
Bullshit Andrew. Haysom communicated her two obligations for returning to the US and committing a guilty plea instead of proceeding her fight for extradition to Canada. 1) Not to rotten in jail. 2) Same punishment for Soering which she could enforce with her testimony.
So in her guilty plea she had to emphasize several times that she only admit to be an accessory before the fact, which sounds quite ridiculous on trial recordings.
It was the family and the connect to Sweeney which hold her longer in prison than she had planned before returning to the US and to help the Commonwealth.
So Soering could have admitted to be an active part of the killings (most likely version) or to be the single killer. He would have been kept in prison as long as Haysom whatever his version would sound like. So he had choosen the 20/80% chance to tell his DC version. Neaton had known that the verdict would end up in a guilty verdict by passing the London confessions in front of the jury.
I guess you are at the beginning of your journey. A man who is pronouncing to be innocent of a serious crime has zero reasons to lie, correct? If you are asking Soering about the case personally you will get aware of some details are getting inconsistent. The other thing is that Soering had 33 years to think about the case and what he told to the police being at the crime scene but what he couldn't have experienced in real cause he "was in DC" due to his version. In some of his actual reasons about wrong details in his confessions (yt video) he had adopted some arguments by myself after analyzing pictures from the crime scene which I found quite weird cause I'm on his case since 6 years. If you will challenge his DC story and the fact that he doesn't have an alibi then it becomes even more weird. His story is that the DC trip was intended to be a sexual intensive weekend for two. But the most weird thing is that they made a huge amount of cash in DC by selling jewelry which will make the motive for a drug deal to solve Haysom's dept nonsense. So forget about to be able to judge about truth what Soering writing in books about what he didn't had done 🤷