Jun 22, 2023·edited Jun 22, 2023Liked by Andrew Hammel
Oh, well. I see an author whom nobody has ever heard of trying to jump on a Netflix gravy train, that might never come. I’m not worried that this is going to be a “Knüller“ as one of the comments suggest.
For starters, English does not appear to be her strong side, or why write “Out now!” about a book that won’t be available before September.
And what could possibly go wrong when you have Guise-Rübe by your side? Hopefully his “expertise” will discourage Hillers from attempting a rehash of “Elizabeth did it herself”. That’s an einstweilige Verfügung waiting to happen.
"Most of her publications are about the Red Army Faction terrorist group from 1970s Germany, a topic I have also written about. She seems to take a very dim view of the RAF, as do I, so good on her!"
According to her German language Wikipedia page, her current work - together with an IT specialist - is about a new theory on the "Death Night of Stammheim", the suicide of the RAF leadership. All her books have been published by "Gallip Verlag & Media", owned by one Daniela Hillers ...
Reading the latest comments on LinkedIn, I‘m getting the impression that Hillers really knows nothing about Andrew Hammel and his work. She can‘t seriously think that there‘s a „Kartenhaus“ that she might bring down. And then, to lecture people on „Pluralität“. The nerve… But this comment already gives away her true agenda: A double murder is a matter of personal opinion, not of facts.
Well let us wait if she will have an answer to all the open questions....e.g.
- Manila envelope letter sent by the real killer (brother Richard realized a strong guilty reaction by Haysom confronting her!)
- Haysom had cash money (selling jewels in DC) for a second ticket (Rocky Horror Picture) forming a proper murder alibi. Well, that was her serious job! But she had failed with a senseless story. Makes no sense - so does Soering's story
- If there is s.th. like beyond a reasonable doubt for Soering according to the DNA exclusion....How about Haysom.......?!
But stressing such a weak argument, who had killed the Haysoms then if both shared killing knowledge, leaving suitable blood type at the crime scene, foot-/shoeprints fitting both and both victims had been murdered most likely in different rooms. 🤷
So:
Motive: together
Planning: together
Hiding: together
Fleeing: together
Showering: together
Aftermath vision: together
Killing: Soering....hm wait a minute....Haysom....hm wait a minute
Oh, well. I see an author whom nobody has ever heard of trying to jump on a Netflix gravy train, that might never come. I’m not worried that this is going to be a “Knüller“ as one of the comments suggest.
For starters, English does not appear to be her strong side, or why write “Out now!” about a book that won’t be available before September.
And what could possibly go wrong when you have Guise-Rübe by your side? Hopefully his “expertise” will discourage Hillers from attempting a rehash of “Elizabeth did it herself”. That’s an einstweilige Verfügung waiting to happen.
"Most of her publications are about the Red Army Faction terrorist group from 1970s Germany, a topic I have also written about. She seems to take a very dim view of the RAF, as do I, so good on her!"
According to her German language Wikipedia page, her current work - together with an IT specialist - is about a new theory on the "Death Night of Stammheim", the suicide of the RAF leadership. All her books have been published by "Gallip Verlag & Media", owned by one Daniela Hillers ...
Reading the latest comments on LinkedIn, I‘m getting the impression that Hillers really knows nothing about Andrew Hammel and his work. She can‘t seriously think that there‘s a „Kartenhaus“ that she might bring down. And then, to lecture people on „Pluralität“. The nerve… But this comment already gives away her true agenda: A double murder is a matter of personal opinion, not of facts.
Well let us wait if she will have an answer to all the open questions....e.g.
- Manila envelope letter sent by the real killer (brother Richard realized a strong guilty reaction by Haysom confronting her!)
- Haysom had cash money (selling jewels in DC) for a second ticket (Rocky Horror Picture) forming a proper murder alibi. Well, that was her serious job! But she had failed with a senseless story. Makes no sense - so does Soering's story
- If there is s.th. like beyond a reasonable doubt for Soering according to the DNA exclusion....How about Haysom.......?!
But stressing such a weak argument, who had killed the Haysoms then if both shared killing knowledge, leaving suitable blood type at the crime scene, foot-/shoeprints fitting both and both victims had been murdered most likely in different rooms. 🤷
So:
Motive: together
Planning: together
Hiding: together
Fleeing: together
Showering: together
Aftermath vision: together
Killing: Soering....hm wait a minute....Haysom....hm wait a minute
toge....!?