Well this is hot shit. I would like to know what kind of motive Burton had at this time to modify results or swabs? The fact that all swabs which had been tested in 2009 for DNA had lead to results which obviously show partly DNA profiles of Derek Haysom, proves that the swabs that Burton had kept all these years should really belong to the Haysom case and not another case!!
BUT the case has two unanswered questions forensically:
1) Why wasn't Derek's blood not be investigated for DNA in 2009?!!! Same for fibers and hairs from the crime scene with blood on it...related to the killings!
2) Why was it possible that Derek's non blood (no mixture) DNA did survive all the blood DNA in the different relevant spots of blood types.
Could it be possible that Burton had contaminated those swabs with fibers from Derek??? (with or without intent)?
That could be a plausible answer!
Once and for all....the two drifters can be excluded only by blood type and NOT by DNA as the results are inconsistent. Otherwise Soering would had been excluded also cause it's not his DNA....to use stereotyped arguments in two directions about the same forensic fact doesn't sound very serious!
It does not make any difference, as far as I am concerned. Mr Soering could ask for new DNA Test but he does not - or does he? .... Long time no hear or see from Mr Soering, his former supporters or anyone else.
Sein Blut wurde nicht auf DNA getestet....das ist ja der große Witz des DFS. Das Teilprofil identisch mit possible father muss ja auch anders eingebracht worden sein.
Well this is hot shit. I would like to know what kind of motive Burton had at this time to modify results or swabs? The fact that all swabs which had been tested in 2009 for DNA had lead to results which obviously show partly DNA profiles of Derek Haysom, proves that the swabs that Burton had kept all these years should really belong to the Haysom case and not another case!!
BUT the case has two unanswered questions forensically:
1) Why wasn't Derek's blood not be investigated for DNA in 2009?!!! Same for fibers and hairs from the crime scene with blood on it...related to the killings!
2) Why was it possible that Derek's non blood (no mixture) DNA did survive all the blood DNA in the different relevant spots of blood types.
Could it be possible that Burton had contaminated those swabs with fibers from Derek??? (with or without intent)?
That could be a plausible answer!
Once and for all....the two drifters can be excluded only by blood type and NOT by DNA as the results are inconsistent. Otherwise Soering would had been excluded also cause it's not his DNA....to use stereotyped arguments in two directions about the same forensic fact doesn't sound very serious!
It does not make any difference, as far as I am concerned. Mr Soering could ask for new DNA Test but he does not - or does he? .... Long time no hear or see from Mr Soering, his former supporters or anyone else.
Sein Blut wurde nicht auf DNA getestet....das ist ja der große Witz des DFS. Das Teilprofil identisch mit possible father muss ja auch anders eingebracht worden sein.
Vielleicht ja sogar mit Burtons Hilfe 🤷