2 Comments
Jun 26, 2023·edited Jun 26, 2023Liked by Andrew Hammel

I don't know whether I should feel sorry for Hillers or not. It seems like she is the next one who loses her reputatation for Söring in the good belief to help an innocent man. How does Söring get it? Why is it still possible nowadays, that people believe his nonsense? Do they really believe him, or are there other reasons to support him? To be honest, I'm looking very excited forward to the book ( and hope I can get it for a low price 😉) just to find out, what kind of game changing news ( or better to say: smoke screens) she will find out.

Maybe the spectacular new whitness had seen aliens at the crimescene, killing the Haysoms and rushing away in green spaceshuttle. Yeah, that must be the solution. That's where the unidentified DNA is from: aliens! And the one of the 15 best DNA experts will find out, 'cause you need high level experts to find alien DNA. The case is solved! Aliens did it!

By the way: I guess the spectacular new witness is nobody less than Sandra Thornton, who Söring already refered to in this video https://youtu.be/4gXme1GtJ6A . As I remember (if I am wrong in this fact, please correct me), Thornton was the one who identified the two swagmen (I can't remember their names at the moment) as those who talked about the case. And both were excluded by the DNA results in the podcast STBC.

So as I already said above: I' m looking forward to Hillers work.

Expand full comment

I don’t feel sorry for Hillers. She’s walking into this eyes wide shut. Name one other 40 year old murder case that has so much information and original documentation - and some of it in translation - available to the general public…

Expand full comment