Hi Andrew. Only few hours left from now to hear the new stuff. I find it quite interesting - the 3 journalists are quite calm and cool in publishing 3 new episodes about their findings while you are just writing a second time before and about that event and doing nothing but spoilering for paid content. Further on you are once again placing one thousand words or more about your speculations, Terry Wright's speculations ("arguments" why Haysom had stayed in DC which are quite poor and without serious substance) and what all the journalists around the world do wrong in this case. OMG. Andrew, one thing serious journalist's shouldn't ever dare "Spoilern" . The second thing which falls out of your wording is praising Wright and yourself for the theory of DNA and blood (Wright's Report in 2019, your article in 2020). Hmmm - no. The origin theory of a contamination (and nothing else is "your" and "Wright's" theory about) was stated by DNA expert Krane and Des Portes in 2017(!!).
It is a big joke to read again that Small Town Big Crime or MCClintock or Jesus Christ had excluded somebody from the murder scene by DNA cause there is no DNA to compare to which is proved to belong to blood 0 (= one murderer that bleed at the scene). It is almost fact but not scientifically proved that all what was found as DNA profil parts in blood 0 and AB ("male") are from Derek Haysom. So only different blood types can be excluded as happened with JF as he didn't have blood type 0.
I would love to hear that Rosenfield and Harding had put more pressure on Nance for a DNA retesting. But I don't know if Soering will also cry out lout for this. You should also have an eye on all that argue with this is senseless (maybe out of team Haysom). Well it is the same with Soering and polygraphs. All things which seems to be nonsense could have a strong true impact on this case😉
Hi Andrew. Only few hours left from now to hear the new stuff. I find it quite interesting - the 3 journalists are quite calm and cool in publishing 3 new episodes about their findings while you are just writing a second time before and about that event and doing nothing but spoilering for paid content. Further on you are once again placing one thousand words or more about your speculations, Terry Wright's speculations ("arguments" why Haysom had stayed in DC which are quite poor and without serious substance) and what all the journalists around the world do wrong in this case. OMG. Andrew, one thing serious journalist's shouldn't ever dare "Spoilern" . The second thing which falls out of your wording is praising Wright and yourself for the theory of DNA and blood (Wright's Report in 2019, your article in 2020). Hmmm - no. The origin theory of a contamination (and nothing else is "your" and "Wright's" theory about) was stated by DNA expert Krane and Des Portes in 2017(!!).
It is a big joke to read again that Small Town Big Crime or MCClintock or Jesus Christ had excluded somebody from the murder scene by DNA cause there is no DNA to compare to which is proved to belong to blood 0 (= one murderer that bleed at the scene). It is almost fact but not scientifically proved that all what was found as DNA profil parts in blood 0 and AB ("male") are from Derek Haysom. So only different blood types can be excluded as happened with JF as he didn't have blood type 0.
I would love to hear that Rosenfield and Harding had put more pressure on Nance for a DNA retesting. But I don't know if Soering will also cry out lout for this. You should also have an eye on all that argue with this is senseless (maybe out of team Haysom). Well it is the same with Soering and polygraphs. All things which seems to be nonsense could have a strong true impact on this case😉